An anonymous shell company is a corporate entity that
has disguised its ownership in order to operate without scrutiny from law
enforcement or the public. These “phantom firms” can open bank accounts and
wire money like any other company, making them a favorite tool for money
launderers to hide their business and assets from authorities. They have
facilitated crimes ranging from Medicare fraud in the United States to illegal logging in Africa to corruption in Malaysia.
For all people and companies, knowing with whom you are doing business
enables good actors to make informed decisions about a deal or transaction,
making it easier to manage potential risk.
For law enforcement, knowing who is controlling companies prevents bad
actors from maintaining plausible deniability and operating with impunity.
How Do Anonymous Companies Work?
At first glance, it might seem pretty easy to find information about the
individuals in control of a company. Many companies list names and phone
numbers for its executives, staff, or board of directors on their website or in
official documents, because they want customers to see the company as open and
accountable. But the people running a phantom firm don’t want to be found and
instead operate in the shadows—they don’t have websites and create as short of
a paper trail as possible.
The forms filled out when a company is created are often the only public
proof of a phantom firm’s existence, and they rarely ask for enough information
to track down the individuals controlling it. Even where they do, this
information can be misleading. Companies can list “nominee” shareholders or
board members with no visible relation to the actual owner—for instance, a
lawyer or a distant relative, or people that can be hired specifically to allow
their names to fill in the blanks on these forms. They can also list other
anonymous companies or trusts in order to make it more difficult to track down
the actual owner. The true owners or people in control of the company are often
known to no one in the outside world other than—possibly—a law firm or incorporation
agent.
Once created, anonymous shell companies do little or no actual business.
Instead, they often exist and function entirely on paper, opening bank accounts
and owning assets without ever revealing the name of the true person benefiting
from its conduct, whether licit or illicit.
Where Can You Create an Anonymous Company?
Beneficial owner is the technical term for the real people who
ultimately own or control a company, even if there are layers of companies in
between that “own” the next company down the chain.
Although the secrecy that phantom firms provide often invokes images of
small, far-away island havens, you can easily create one in almost every
jurisdiction in the world. This includes every state in the United States. In
fact, a 2012 study found that the United States was the 2nd easiest
place in the world for criminals to incorporate an anonymous shell company for
clearly illegal activities, behind only Kenya.
How Can We Eliminate Anonymous Companies?
All companies should be required to disclose their ultimate, human,
beneficial owner(s) when they are created, and this information should be
listed in a central registry. Ideally, these registries should be freely
available to the public, rather than just to law enforcement so that everyone
has the ability to know with whom they are doing business.
What is Being Done to Eliminate Anonymous Companies?
The UK Government has promised to lead the world by establishing the
first-ever public registry of beneficial ownership information for all UK
companies. Legislation and implementation is currently pending. The European
Parliament voted in March 2014 in favor of creating a similar registry for all
EU companies and trusts, but further action by the EU Commission and European
Council is pending.
In the United States, GFI supports the Incorporation Transparency and
Law Enforcement Assistance Act, which would eliminate anonymous shell companies
in the United States by creating registries of beneficial ownership information
that would be available to law enforcement. While this federal legislation
does not require that the information be made publicly available, it leaves the
door open for the states to do so.
No comments:
Post a Comment