Thursday, November 21, 2024

Urbi et Orbi: The Final Act of Putin’s Nuclear Madness

 In February 2007, Putin delivered his inaugural global message at the Munich Security Conference. He rejected the unipolar world order and railed against NATO expansion, blaming it on Western ambition rather than acknowledging the truth: former Soviet satellites were fleeing to NATO, desperate for security from Moscow’s shadow. Fueled by phantom pains from the USSR's collapse, Putin fed on Western capital and grew into a delusional expansionist, much like Hitler in his day. Fast-forward to today: 89% of Russians, according to polls, are "happy people" while their government annihilates Ukraine and teeters on the brink of global annihilation.

Putin’s second global address came on February 24, 2022, with the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Proclaiming a nonsensical fight against "Ukrainian Nazism" and promising Ukraine’s “demilitarization,” Putin envisioned a swift victory. But his delusions crumbled against two realities:
There is no Nazism in Ukraine. You cannot defeat what doesn’t exist.
“Demilitarization” meant extermination or Siberia. Ukrainians were not about to allow history to repeat itself.
And now, we’ve reached his third address—an unhinged diatribe delivered from the confines of his bunker. It’s as though his warped mind, isolated from reality, has finally crossed the event horizon of nuclear madness.
Here’s what Putin declared to the world:
The United States is to blame for all global woes, but his response is to bomb Ukrainian cities with intercontinental ballistic missiles.
He’s summoned 10,000 North Korean troops to Ukraine, yet claims the U.S. has triggered global war.
He has already fired an intercontinental ballistic missile at Dnipro and plans to continue these attacks, giving advance warnings so residents can flee.
He reserves the right to strike any country, at any time, for any reason. No one is safe from his missiles.
Even Putin’s inner circle was reportedly stunned. Russian generals learned of his latest lunacy through state television and were left asking: “Should we evacuate our families from Moscow?”
For Ukrainians, this changes little. We’ve endured over 1,000 days of missile strikes, bombings, and atrocities. But this escalation isn’t just about Ukraine anymore. It’s about saving the planet. Putin’s threats signal a shift from regional tyranny to global terror. His nuclear posturing is no longer a bluff; it’s an existential threat to humanity.
How will the world respond? What will the two American presidents—one current, one looming—and Europe do in the face of this final descent into madness?
The choice is stark: the light of freedom or the darkness of nuclear annihilation. The time for appeasement and moral equivocation is over.
To those who once argued for restraint, claiming Putin’s actions were justifiable or that Ukrainians should surrender their land for peace—do you still believe appeasement will stop this madman? Can the world afford to let him dictate the terms of survival?
Ukraine has drawn the line in the sand, defending not just its borders but the values of liberty, sovereignty, and human dignity. Now, it’s time for the rest of the free world to decide: Will we confront this nuclear madness head-on, or will we cower and allow the light of freedom to be extinguished?
The stakes have never been higher.
Glory to Ukraine!

No comments:

Post a Comment