Lucy Adams

Today’s blog is not a fundamental work or detailed analysis but rather a simple argument on a given topic. I’m sure you already know much about the importance of criticism for an aspiring author, so now I just want to share thoughts on the kinds of criticism and the motives that pushed the authors to get it.

Let’s start with how the author can get critical feedback on his work, from the simplest to the most complex:

1. Show the text to a friend.

2. Upload to on one of the authoritative websites.

3. Send for review to a pen wizard.

#1 A Friend as a Critic

I believe the quality and independence of criticism increases according to the list. Speaking of friendly critique, keep in mind that not everyone has at least one friend well versed in literature and the nuances of writing. It often happens that friends assess texts from the perspective of an ordinary and almost always loyal reader. Friendly criticism is often far from objective, at least for the reason of a good attitude towards the writer as a person.

Therefore, the reviewer for the friendly criticism should be chosen very and very carefully. Be sure to instruct him properly so that he shares everything he thinks. But even in this case, we can’t speak about complete impartiality.

On the other hand, we all know examples of authors whose first and best critics are their spouses. It means that this method, though it implies significant reservations, remains valid and useful.

#2 The Internet

An option to upload your work on the Internet may seem simple and attractive as it implies a speedy reaction and the ability to remain anonymous. At first glance, it so easy: just upload the work and get reviews from knowledgeable people in a couple of days!

But are these "critics" really knowledgeable? Have you ever thought about who reads the texts and writes reviews on websites for aspiring writers? Yes, the same beginners. What can they teach you? Obviously, nothing.

Maybe you'll get lucky and get an opinion of one of the old-timers, but the bulk of criticism will consist of subjective judgments about how to write. Not specifically toward your text, style, ideas, and themes, but in general.

#3 Pen Wizard’s Review

Of course, a review from a master can become a powerful impetus for development. But it’s not so easy to get it. Few writers gave free time to read everything they are sent, let alone to provide you with an extensive review.

Therefore, this method, though it seems the most correct from the perspective of quality, is practically inapplicable.

How Authors of Different Levels Perceive Criticism

I did a small research. Browsing through a dozen of websites, I left a few reviews. These text did not stand out as something special; almost all were written by people who make their first steps. Realizing this, I left only short summaries, indicating the main structural weakness (the absence of conflict or intrigue, the wrong arrangement of semantic units, insufficient attention to the development of the conflict, etc.). I deliberately didn't say anything about the wordiness and spelling, as well as style and errors in sentence structure.

However, the authors, to my surprise, very coldly responded to my reviews, and sometimes even argue. At the same time, the critiques of spelling errors, commas, and tautologies from other critics were met with great gratitude. This led me to a curious thought:

Criticism should correspond to the level of the author. Otherwise, he simply will not understand it. There is no need for details if the author hasn't yet learned the basics.

Therefore, there’s almost no need for novices to ask gurus for critics – just because they are on the different levels.

Why Do People Ask to Read Their Text?

Have you ever thought of the reason why people post their texts on the network, send to reviews of authoritative experts, and participate in contests? What motivates these authors?

Of course, some of them are really willing to receive constructive criticism that will help to improve and grow. But for many others, this is just a way to get some recognition and admiration. Actually, they are not interested in criticism. And they do not appreciate your efforts as a critic.

I have long understood that not everyone who sends his work under review wants to receive criticism. Many are only interested in recognition of their talent and skill. Good or bad, but it’s true.

I’m waiting for your opinions in the comments. See you soon!

Bio:

Lucy Adam is always ready to provide you with the best online essay writing help. She’s a generalist so that you can share your craziest topics and get the research done soon. Given Lucy’s blogs are free, don’t miss this brilliant opportunity!