Paul Taylor
Why Europe better stand up to Warsaw’s illiberal
rulers.
President of the Law and Justice party Jaroslaw Kaczynski | Pawel Supernak/EPA
GDAŃSK,
Poland — Poland’s de facto ruler, Jarosław Kaczyński, is betting he can get
away with emasculating his country’s constitutional court without incurring
European Union sanctions.
To
be sure, things are looking up for the conservative nationalist. Under
President Barack Obama, the United States joined the EU in criticizing the
weakening of the rule of law in Poland. His successor, Donald Trump, is more
likely to give a pass to Kaczyński, a fellow anti-establishment nativist.
Yet
Europe has plenty of tools it could use to help Poles resist a dismantling of
their liberal democracy without having to resort to the implausible “nuclear
weapon” of suspending Warsaw’s EU voting rights.
The
parliamentary opposition may be divided and poorly led, but something of the
spirit of Solidarity — the grassroots movement that overcame Communist
repression — is reawakening to protect civil rights, freedom of speech and
diversity.
As
the women’s protest that forced the government to back down on a draconian
tightening of the Roman Catholic country’s restrictive abortion law showed last
month, there are plenty of Poles ready to engage in active resistance. In the
words of the national anthem, “Poland is not yet lost.”
Since
his Law and Justice party’s landslide election win last year, Kaczyński, who
rules from the shadows without holding executive office, has taken a knife to
the judiciary, the security services, public broadcasters and many of the
checks and balances in Polish society. In his drive to purge cosmopolitan
liberals and leftists, and replace them with “patriots,” the education system
and the armed forces are next on the hit list.
His
move to pack the constitutional court with loyalists, unseat the previous
center-right government’s last appointees and expunge recent court rulings
prompted the European Commission to open an investigation into the rule of law
in Poland, with broad backing from member countries, setting Brussels and
Warsaw on a collision course.
Blame Brussels
Kaczyński
makes no secret of his contempt for the EU and its liberal values. He has
spurned a face-saving solution worked out by Commission First Vice-President
Frans Timmermans and Polish officials. He doesn’t want a compromise. He wants
to confront Brussels and prevail.
That
creates a dilemma for Commission officials. The next step the Commission can
take in the legal procedure against countries that breach fundamental rights is
to recommend sanctions. But this would require the unanimous consent of the
other members, and is likely to be vetoed by Hungary’s Viktor Orbán, Kaczyński’s
Central European partner in majoritarian autocracy.
The
Polish leader could also turn such a move to domestic advantage, denouncing
Eurocrats bent on thwarting the will of the people. Similarly, if the EU were
to withhold funds for economic development and agriculture, he could blame
Brussels, rather than his cronyism and unorthodox policies, for causing
economic havoc.
And
yet, Europe can’t afford to back away from further action against Warsaw. It
would look weak and irresolute, handing Kaczyński a victory to the despair of
Polish liberals and embolden him — and Orbán — to go further.
The
Commission should not be left alone at this critical moment. The EU’s member
countries must join together to send Warsaw a clear message: Europe is
watching, and it will not allow Poland to slide into illiberalism.
“There
is a strong concern in civil society that the West will get exhausted with
quarrels with Kaczyński,” said Marek Grela, who was Poland’s first permanent
representative to the EU and is now a professor at Vistula University. “The
response should not be left to the EU bureaucracy but led by the member states
who are listened to in Poland — by France, by Italy, by the Netherlands.”
Timmermans,
who is determined to keep up the pressure on Warsaw, feels the same way. “There
is a lot of tacit support across the EU… but we (the Commission) can’t do this
on our own,” he said. “Others need to pick up the ball as well.”
European response
Despite
pessimism in Brussels, European leaders can do much to rein in Kaczyński. Under
center-right former Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who now chairs EU summits as
president of the European Council, Poland gained influence in Brussels and
Berlin. That counted when it came to responding to Russia’s seizure of Crimea
and destabilization of Ukraine, or to making Central Europe less dependent on
Russian energy supplies.
By
contrast, an isolated Poland will find it harder to secure money, military
protection or support over gas pipelines, as well as foreign investment, which
is already drying up.
Whatever
Kaczyński and his supporters may say, this matters to Poles. They need Europe’s
support, not just financially but also politically and diplomatically in
standing firm with Moscow.
In
crafting their response, European leaders should listen to Polish intellectuals
who are urging EU action to raise pressure on Kaczyński, sustain civil society
and prepare for a restoration of liberalism when he eventually loses power.
Marek
Wasilewski, editor of the cultural journal CzasKultury based in Poznan, said
the EU should take at least some symbolic sanctions, such as a temporary
suspension of Poland’s voting rights, to show it is not toothless.
“The
government is playing with the EU on the assumption that it will do nothing,
that it’s a talking shop. So sanctions are a necessary step to prove the EU
institutions can do something,” he said. “The abortion protests show that when
they feel huge pressure, they step back. But only when they can feel real
resistance.”
Pressure, not sanctions
While
civil liberties have deteriorated in the year since Law and Justice took power,
there are still significant counter-powers, including a majority of regions and
cities run by the pro-European opposition, privately owned media and numerous
civil society groups. The spontaneously created Committee to Defend Democracy
(KOD) has staged mass protests in dozens of towns across Poland.
“What
we need is more political pressure, not sanctions,” said Aleksander Smolar,
president of the Stefan Batory Foundation, which promotes an open, democratic
society. “European commissioners and foreign ministers should visit Poland
every month and speak out to keep the issue in the headlines. Poles care about
how others see them.”
Other
EU countries should issue a joint declaration of concern about the erosion of
civil rights and the rule of law and raise the issue in every contact with the
Polish government, he added.
Mateusz
Kijowski, an IT entrepreneur who founded KOD a year ago, says Polish ministers
and politicians should be questioned about breaches of EU treaty principles
each time they travel abroad. “We need strong pressure coordinated with inside
forces,” he said.
On the economic front, without suspending aid to
Warsaw, the Commission could declare that the absence of independent judicial
scrutiny and the sacking of experts means it can no longer certify that EU
funds are being properly spent, Grela suggested. This could justify additional
safeguards before structural or agricultural funds are disbursed, upsetting
Warsaw’s budget planning.
Wasilewski said the Commission should reroute EU money
through regional and municipal authorities, sidestepping the central
government. “If you simply take money away, you could turn very pro-European
Polish society against the EU, but re-routing it creates enormous pressure on a
government which needs EU money to enable it to pursue its policies such as
paying 500 zloty (€125) for every child,” he said.
The EU can also do more to support civil society, as
the West did in the 1980s after the communist government outlawed Solidarity.
It should aggressively promote cultural exchanges and twinned towns to convey a
message of hope.
KOD’s Kijowski requested financial support for the
democracy movement when he visited Paris and Brussels. While European Parliament
President Martin Schulz received him, other EU leaders have not found the time.
They should do so.
Finally, the EU’s main pan-European political parties
should bring together Polish opposition politicians around a common platform to
support democracy.
For historical reasons, Germany has had to take a back
seat in criticism and action against Poland. But Berlin joined Paris last month
in scrapping a planned summit of the so-called Weimar Triangle, created after
communism collapsed to engage Warsaw with Europe’s two leading powers.
The message to Kaczyński was clear: As long as you go
on behaving this way, you are not fit to be a partner in European leadership.
No comments:
Post a Comment