UK seeks to lessen blow of Brexit by retaining aspects
of EU’s trade deals.
LONDON — The U.K. will try to soften the economic blow
of Brexit by clinging on to as many EU trade agreements with non-EU countries
as it can, a senior Whitehall official indicated.
While Prime Minister Theresa May and Trade Secretary
Liam Fox have publicly focused on the potential for Britain to strike fresh
bilateral free-trade deals after Brexit, a senior civil servant in Fox’s
Department for International Trade (DIT) said Tuesday that “continuity” in
trade agreements with around 30 countries, with which the U.K. currently trades
via EU-brokered agreements, would be a priority.
John Alty, director general of DIT’s Trade Policy
Group, said his department’s work was currently only in the “planning and
exploratory” stage, indicating that key decisions such as whether the U.K.
remains within the European customs union, or the common commercial policy, had
not yet been made.
But he said the department had begun work on “certain
things that we are pretty confident we will need to do,” such as establishing
the U.K.’s new place in the World Trade Organization, and looking at existing
EU trade agreements with non-EU countries, which he said would provide “some
sort of benchmark for our trading relations.”
“We’re looking at existing agreements that the EU has
with a number of countries — about 30 actually, some of them developing
countries,” he said. “Those will be priorities, to test out the appetite of
countries to seek continuity there.”
The U.K. was also “trying to push the trade agenda”
while it remained in the EU, Alty said, singling out the Trade in Services
Agreement, which aims at liberalizing trade in services such as banking,
healthcare and transport between the EU, the U.S. and more than 20 other
counties.
“That would be a very important agreement for the U.K.
to be part of,” he said.
Economists often note the political challenges of
seeking to retain the conditions of the EU’s deals. South Korea, for example,
is a bigger exporter of goods than the U.K. and Seoul would probably seek more
favorable trade terms than those in its EU deal.
No comments:
Post a Comment