Posted in Business Development, Leadership, Marketing
The development of new business rarely occurs in a vacuum. In professional service firms where marketing and business development are silos at best, or necessary evils at worst, organic growth will be painfully difficult. And there will be consistent debates over where and how to invest resources.
The development of new business rarely occurs in a vacuum. In professional service firms where marketing and business development are silos at best, or necessary evils at worst, organic growth will be painfully difficult. And there will be consistent debates over where and how to invest resources.
By contrast, firms that realize measurable
success — even in a volatile marketplace — have a wholistic view of the
organization. Planning is a discipline that considers a number of factors —
resources, nature of the practice(s), compensation structure, governance,
competitive landscape and a go-to-market philosophy.
Constant debates over firm priorities and which opportunity to pursue are an indication that the go-to-market philosophy may not be aligned with clearly identified and shared goals.
Constant debates over firm priorities and which opportunity to pursue are an indication that the go-to-market philosophy may not be aligned with clearly identified and shared goals.
Where identified goals are absent, a reactive approach to the market takes the place of
strategy. Priorities shift based on the siren call of “opportunity.” Instinct
tends to characterizes the decision-making processes. Not an ideal
approach to a competitive marketplace.
To the degree issues of how, where, or even whether to grow
are not reflected and addressed in an organization’s goals and aspirations, a
functional firm-wide strategic plan does not exist. And
in this vacuum silos form.
Most organizations will face regular decisions
around:
·
where to invest;
·
how ROI on the investment will be measured;
·
the breadth of the practice to be offered;
·
how to survive aggressive competition, economic downturns or other market
pressures;
·
how to evaluate opportunities;
·
which opportunities to seize, and which to let go;
·
how to prioritize investments;
·
the role of technology;
·
when and how to invest in innovation.
And the list goes on. It is difficult to imagine
that many would suggest a professional service firm operate without guide posts in place that help shape a
response to these questions.
Yet many do not see the connection between these
fundamental issues, a strategic plan, and a sophisticated approach to the
pursuit of business.
The Critical Strategic Planning Question
You may share scores of hopes — dreams, even.
But the aspirations and goals that are central to the existence of a group are
few. Certainly, no two endeavors are the same; but here’s fodder to help
identify pivotal goals or aspirations.
·
What do we agree on with respect to why we do what we do?
·
Without respect to personal feelings about good, bad, right or wrong, can
we prioritize
·
increased profitability
·
life style
·
reputation
·
legacy?
·
Do you want to grow in numbers? Be global?
Local?
·
Do you value and aspire to rich diversity?
·
Do you agree on role in the community, and how that plays out in
enterprise?
There is an endless list of questions within the
question.
But answer — what are
our most deeply shared goals and aspirations? — and you
have a framework for every significant decision. For who we choose to work with; where we decide to invest; when to
strike (and when to retreat); how to define priorities; what we value most.
When it comes to business development, shared
aspirations will go a long way toward speaking to issues of motivation, cross
selling, the amount to invest in new pursuits versus the deepening of existing
relationships. Even compensation.
This is not to suggest that answers come easy.
It is to say that when you have identified the handful of
things that you share, you have a basis for decision making. Effective business development strategies are built on this.
No comments:
Post a Comment