Thursday, September 8, 2016

Mining the Gold in Corporate Contracts

, Legaltech News

An look at how general counsel are recovering value in contract discovery in a new manner.


The goal of traditional contract management has been to find and track all corporate agreements. Today, innovative general counsel are finding that the real value of contracts lies within the content—and mining that content exposes adherence to compliance issues, either to the company or to support a potential external recovery opportunity.


Discovering those risk and/or return nuggets can help general counsel in their role as corporate risk manager. Finding vendor or customer compliance opportunities can turn the GC into King Midas—using the gold in the contracts to recover real dollars—and potentially change the value of the GC from leader of the law department as a cost center to that of a “profit center.” This is referred to as “contract recovery.”

While capturing important data via contract management software such as type of contract, contract abstract, parties or renewal dates is very helpful, there is no quantitative return on investment for basic contract management. 

Contract management can be very costly—spanning people, process and technology—but it does serve a purpose. The process of inventorying, compiling, capturing and abstracting contracts represents good “risk management hygiene.” However, content (the agreement provisions, paragraphs, embedded compliance requirements) is where we find the real value of contracts.

Traditional Contract Discovery

Discovering content in a corporation’s contracts is not a new idea. Law departments and general counsel have been wanting and working to understand the provisions in contracts for decades.

Merger and acquisition deals, for example, have been focused on contract “discovery.” In a “buy” side transaction, the purchasing party typically spends big legal dollars relating to the deal to understand the seller’s contractual requirements, encumbrances and responsibilities. The buyer needs to grasp the risks to them in a transaction, and this contract review process has been a longtime, large revenue generator for outside lawyers.

Traditionally, the buyer’s lawyers spend many billable hours manually poring through agreements. On large, complicated transactions, there can be lawyer teams numbering in the hundreds, all of whom used to be stationed in front of hard copy agreements, and in the past 30 years, in front of one or more computer monitors reviewing agreements and marking issues/risks on paper or electronically. Hundred, thousands and sometimes hundreds of thousands of expensive lawyer person-hours were spent reviewing agreements to discover their contents.

Contract discovery, then, has been a regular and needed part of many business transactions, but it is very time-consuming and costly. Lawyers needed to be focused, diligent, detail-oriented and invested to accurately discover contract contents. Humans are expensive and fallible. There are many examples of missed language or intent, causing unforeseen surprises.

GCs have long desired to understand their exposures and opportunities in their agreements, at large, outside of matter-based contract review. The issue has been one of expense, resources, time and priority, as very few law departments have been able to proactively review their contract databases. It is just too hard and too expensive.

Over the past 10-15 years, a shift has occurred in contract review services. Law firms, law departments and specialty outsiders have driven the workforce costs down by scaling review with on-shore or offshore contract lawyer resources. 

Quite a few different models have emerged that have helped to commoditize these human resources services. While this market evolution has resulted in dramatically decreased costs, the bottom line is that contract discovery remains costly, time-intensive and error-prone.

The New Contract Discovery

Over the past several years, technology not dissimilar to e-discovery review software has begun to enter the market fray. As of this writing, a non-exhaustive list of players includes kReveal, Seal Software, eBrevia, Brightleaf, Kira and RAVN. These software technologies, grossly simplified, focus on parsing through many electronic documents that have been digitized using optical character recognition to identify, flag and group items that the corporation has identified as potential issue or interest areas.

These technologies can be configured to search for different types of content (some are more powerful, preconfigured, more user-friendly, than others). Many of these solutions utilize some sort of “learning” and/or “intelligence” algorithms and processing, so that wording that may be close to but different from search terms is identified, and in some cases, some level of intent can be discerned via the software.

Corporations benefit dramatically by reducing spend, eliminating staffing and management of large lawyer teams, avoiding human error and dramatically reducing cycle time.

Discovery focus can be twofold. Many of these solutions can “crawl” through corporate repositories, document management systems, network shares, etc., to discover documents that may be “contracts or agreements,” finding intellectual property that is not even captured in the contract management system or database(s).

The more provocative opportunity is the technology-based search and discovery of substantive elements of the agreements, whether they take the form of most favored nations pricing, specific compliance requirements or non-competes. This is the “gold” that sets the stage for the GC to be the true “risk manager” of the corporation and, potentially, the information that can be exploited for revenue or profit recovery purposes.

The Road to Recovery

The term “contract recovery” is assigned not just to the discovery of substantive contract value, but aggregating that with the actual process of recovery. The legal road is chock-full of “could have” or “would have” from those that identified recovery opportunities in the past, but what is needed is an executable process that allows for the corporation to actually take advantage of discoveries and turn them into real, quantifiable recoveries.

Much of the evolution of contract management to contract discovery involves technology. And while the technology is a critical piece to this modern approach, it is the melding of process and technology that becomes a game-changer. Implementing a well-thought-out process and methodology with roots in e-discovery enables law departments to not only identify issues but to optimize recoveries. Teaming up technologists, consultants, software providers and lawyers helps law department counsel to drive value from contracts.

In the near term, expect to see continuing development and increased leverage of technologies to identify, process, review and analyze document sets to support contract management. Contract discovery tools will drive the ongoing identification and analysis of potential new opportunities for risk mitigation and recovery opportunities. The “Road to Recovery” process will allow for the exploitation of revenue recovery and ensure the follow-through to turn those nuggets into gold.

Ultimately, law departments will be turning contract discovery and recovery investments into positive ROI, so that the law department and GC become a revenue and profit generator. King Midas, anyone?


No comments:

Post a Comment