Today, 27 January 2016, Pre-Trial Chamber I of the International Criminal
On 13 October 2015, the ICC Prosecutor submitted her "Request for
authorisation of an investigation pursuant to article 15" of the Rome Statute, asking for
authorization from Pre-Trial Chamber I to proceed with an investigation into
the situation in Georgia, for war crimes and crimes against humanity allegedly
committed in and around South Ossetia in 2008. On 4 December 2015, the
Chamber received the representations by or on behalf of 6,335 victims on this
matter.
The Chamber noted that, according to article 15 of the Rome Statute, it has
the mandate to ensure judicial control over the Prosecutor's exercise of
her proprio motu power to open an investigation in the absence
of a referral by a State Party or by the United Nations Security Council.
The
Chamber also stressed that, in light of the procedural stage and the purpose of
its control, the Chamber's examination of the Prosecutor's request must be
strictly limited.
After examining the request and the supporting material, the Chamber
concluded that there is a reasonable basis to believe that crimes within the
ICC's jurisdiction have been committed in the situation in Georgia. Such crimes
include crimes against humanity, such as murder, forcible transfer of
population and persecution, and war crimes, such as attacks against the
civilian population, wilful killing, intentionally directing attacks against
peacekeepers, destruction of property and pillaging allegedly committed in the
context of an international armed conflict between 1 July and 10 October 2008.
The Chamber also found that potential cases arising out of the situation would
be admissible before the Court and that there are no substantial reasons to
believe that an investigation would not serve the interests of justice taking
into account the gravity of the crimes and the interests of victims. In
conclusion the Chamber granted the ICC Prosecutor's request to proceed with an
investigation into the situation in Georgia.
Judge Péter Kovács joined a separate opinion, indicating that while he
shares the Majority's views that there is a reasonable basis to proceed with an
investigation into the Georgia situation, he differs with it on the scope and
extent of the judicial control of the Prosecutor's request, on the Chamber's
role in examining and eventually rectifying the Prosecutor's assessment of the
alleged crimes under the Court's jurisdiction, and on the scope and the level
of details required for the admissibility assessment.
No comments:
Post a Comment