On September 5, 2014, two days after President Obama visited Estonia to
symbolize America’s commitment to its security, Russian agents crossed into
Estonia and kidnapped an Estonian security official. Last week, after a closed
trial, Russia sentenced him to 15 years.
The reaction? The State Department issued a statement. The NATO
secretary-general issued a tweet. Neither did anything. The European Union
(reportsthe Wall Street Journal) said it was too early to discuss any possible action.
The timing of this brazen violation of NATO territory — immediately
after Obama’s visit — is testimony to Vladimir Putin’s contempt for the
American president. He knows Obama would do nothing. Why should he think
otherwise?
● Putin breaks the arms embargo to Iran by lifting the hold on selling it S-300
missiles. Obama responds by excusing him, saying it wasn’t technically illegal and adding, with a tip of the hat
to Putin’s patience: “I’m frankly surprised that it held this long.”
● Russia mousetraps Obama at the eleventh hour of the Iran negotiations,
joining Iran in demanding that the conventional-weapons and ballistic-missile
embargoes be dropped. Obama caves.
● Putin invades Ukraine, annexes Crimea, breaks two Minsk cease-fire
agreements and erases the Russia-Ukraine border — effectively tearing up the
post-Cold War settlement of 1994. Obama’s response? Pinprick sanctions, empty
threats and a continuing refusal to supply Ukraine with defensive weaponry,
lest he provoke Putin.
The East Europeans have noticed. In February, Lithuania decided to
reinstate conscription, a move strategically insignificant — the Lithuanians
couldn’t hold off the Russian army for a day — but highly symbolic. Eastern
Europe has been begging NATO to station permanent bases on its territory as a
tripwire guaranteeing a powerful NATO/U.S. response to any Russian aggression.
NATO has refused. Instead, Obama offered more military exercises in the
Baltic States and Poland. And threw in an additional 250 tanks and armored
vehicles, spread among seven allies.
It is true that Putin’s resentment over Russia’s lost
empire long predates Obama. But for resentment to turn into revanchism — an
active policy of reconquest — requires opportunity. Which is exactly what
Obama’s “reset” policy has offered over the past six and a half years.
Since the end of World War II, Russia has known that what stands in the
way of westward expansion was not Europe, living happily in decadent repose,
but the United States as guarantor of Western security. Obama’s naivete and
ambivalence have put those guarantees in question.
It began with the reset button, ostentatiously offered less than two months after Obama’s swearing-in.
Followed six months later by the unilateral American
cancellation of the missile
shield the Poles and the Czechs had agreed to install on their territory.
Again, lest Putin be upset.
By 2012, a still clueless Obama mocked Mitt Romney for saying that Russia is “without question our No. 1 geopolitical foe,”
quipping oh so cleverly: “The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign
policy back.” After all, he explained, “the Cold War’s been over for 20 years.”
Turned out it was 2015 calling. Obama’s own top officials have been
retroactively vindicating Romney. Last month, Obama’s choice for chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff declared that “Russia presents
the greatest threat to our national security.” Two weeks ago, the retiring Army
chief of staff, Raymond Odierno, called Russia our “most dangerous” military threat. Obama’s own secretary of defense has gone one better:
“Russia poses an existential
threat to the United
States.”
Turns out the Cold War is not over either. Putin is intent on reviving
it. Helped immensely by Obama’s epic misjudgment of Russian intentions, the
balance of power has shifted — and America’s allies feel it.
And not just the East Europeans. The president of
Egypt, a country estranged from Russia for 40 years and our mainstay Arab ally
in the Middle East, has twice visited Moscow within the last four months.
The Saudis, congenitally wary of Russia but shell-shocked by Obama’s
grand nuclear capitulation to Iran that will make it the regional hegemon, are
searching for alternatives, too. At a recent economic conference in St.
Petersburg, the Saudis invited Putin to Riyadh and the Russians reciprocated by
inviting the new King Salman to visit Czar Vladimir in Moscow.
Even Pakistan, a traditional Chinese ally and Russian adversary, is
buying Mi-35 helicopters from Russia, which is building a natural gas pipeline between Karachi and Lahore.
As John Kerry awaits his upcoming Nobel and Obama plans his presidential
library (my suggestion: Havana), Putin is deciding how to best exploit the
final 17 months of his Obama bonanza.
The world sees it. Obama doesn’t.
No comments:
Post a Comment