The legal authority for US spy agencies
to bulk collect Americans' phone data has expired, after the Senate failed to
reach a deal.
The relevant provisions of the Patriot
Act lapsed at midnight (04:00 GMT).
However, the Senate did vote to advance
the White House-backed Freedom Act so a new form of data collection is likely
to be approved in the coming days.
The Freedom Act imposes more controls
following shocking revelations by Edward Snowden.
The former National Security Agency
(NSA) contractor first exposed the extent of the data collection in 2013.
'Silver linings'
The White House described the expiry of
the deadline as an "irresponsible lapse" by the Senate.
"On a matter as critical as our
national security, individual senators must put aside their partisan
motivations and act swiftly. The American people deserve nothing less," it
said in a statement.
The failure to reach a deal means that security
services have temporarily lost the right to bulk collect Americans' phone
records, to monitor "lone wolf" terror suspects and to carry out
"roving wiretaps" of suspects.
The government can still continue to
collect information related to any foreign intelligence investigations.
Analysts also said there could be
workarounds to allow continued data collection in some cases. Authorities could
try to argue that older legal provisions - so-called grandfather clauses -
still apply.
However, the NSA, which runs the
majority of surveillance programmes, has begun switching off its servers that
collect the affected data.
The failure to reach any agreement in
the rare Sunday sitting of the Senate was the result of the actions of Republican presidential hopeful Rand Paul.
A libertarian, Mr Paul led a filibuster
- using extended debates to delay or block the passing of legislation - to stop
the quick passage of the Freedom Act, arguing that data collection is illegal
and unconstitutional. He also blocked an extension of the Patriot Act.
On Sunday he said: "This is what we
fought the revolution over, are we going to so blithely give up our
freedom?"
Bulk data collection rulings
NSA phone surveillance first revealed in June 2013 by
Edward Snowden
Federal judge in Washington rules in December 2013
that mass collection may be unconstitutional
A week later, a New York district judge says it is
legal
House of Representatives passes bill in May 2014 to
end NSA bulk collection
A few days later, President Barack Obama tells
Congress to pass a bill ending the practice
After the deadline passed, he added:
"Tonight begins the process of ending bulk collection. The bill will
ultimately pass but we always look for silver linings. I think the bill may be
replacing one form of bulk collection with another but the government after
this bill passes will no longer collect your phone records."
His actions have infuriated many other
Republicans. They left the chamber en masse when Mr Paul rose to speak.
Senator John McCain said Mr Paul was
putting "a higher priority on his fundraising and his ambitions than on
the security of the nation".
The situation was uncomfortable for Senate Majority
Leader Mitch McConnell, who has endorsed Mr Paul's presidential campaign, and
led to a dramatic reverse by the Republican-controlled Senate.
The Freedom Act had been approved by the House of
Representatives and the White House but the Senate rejected it last week by a
vote of 57-42.
Once it became clear that the Patriot Act extension
would not be possible, senators voted 77-17 to move forward with the Freedom
Act.
Mr McConnell, who had opposed the bill originally,
said that senators were left with little choice but to pass it in order to
restore surveillance powers.
"It's not ideal but, along with votes on some
modest amendments that attempt to ensure the program can actually work as
promised, it's now the only realistic way forward," Mr McConnell said.
The BBC's North America Editor Jon Sopel says that
although the new legislation is likely to be passed in the coming days, the
delay will be seen as a victory for Mr Paul.
Mr Paul's embrace of civil liberties is bringing new
members to the Republican Party, but at the same time is alienating many
others, he says.
No comments:
Post a Comment