Ukrainian Law Blog
Freedom means the supremacy of human rights everywhere
(Move to ...)
Home
Ads Kit
▼
Topics
(Move to ...)
Home
Artificial Intelligence
BB: bitcoin, blockchain
Business Law
Crowdfunding
Cybersecurity
Design Blog
Doing errands in Ukraine
Employment law
EU's Apple tax case
Intellectual Property
IoT - The Internet Of Things
Jenny Holt
KNEU’s Lawyers: Alternative Legal Service Provider...
Legal business/Legal tech
Lucy Adams: essay writing
MH17
Remote Working
Startups
Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
Vic Eugene Nicholson ♫♪♫
Rzeczpospolita Polska
Ukraine. Returning own history / Украина. Возвращение своей истории
Ukrainian Art
Алексей Арестович
Commercial representation
Running Errands in Ukraine
Free Legal Advice
About me
▼
Thursday, February 15, 2018
Argument preview: Should courts read statutory exclusionary rules broadly?
Dahda v. United States
arguably poses a clash between two of the Supreme Court’s recent passions: strict adherence to statutory texts and cutting back on the exclusionary rule. This tension is unusual because the court’s exclusionary-rule decisions typically involve Fourth Amendment violations. By contrast, this case involves Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. And that statute contains an explicit exclusionary rule.
No comments:
Post a Comment
‹
›
Home
View web version
No comments:
Post a Comment