Ukrainian Law Blog
Freedom means the supremacy of human rights everywhere
Thursday, February 15, 2018
Argument preview: Should courts read statutory exclusionary rules broadly?
Dahda v. United States
arguably poses a clash between two of the Supreme Court’s recent passions: strict adherence to statutory texts and cutting back on the exclusionary rule. This tension is unusual because the court’s exclusionary-rule decisions typically involve Fourth Amendment violations. By contrast, this case involves Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. And that statute contains an explicit exclusionary rule.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Newer Post
Older Post
Home
View mobile version
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment