As a Commonwealth nation, Singapore’s legal system has
its roots in English law and practice. Founded in 1819 by Sir Stamford Raffles,
the once sleepy island was transformed into a major entrepȏt along
the shipping route between Europe and the Far East. With the arrival of the
British, English law and customs were adopted.
Since self-governance in 1959 and independence from
Malaysia in 1965, Singapore has developed its own autochthonous legal system,
establishing legislation and case law that are unique to its social and
economic circumstances.
Despite forging its own path suited to Singapore’s
requirements, there is one inherited British legal foundation that remains
intact, albeit just: common law. Singapore inherited the English common law
traditions, especially in contract, tort and restitution, and thus the
stability, certainty and acceptance that such law enjoys among other
Commonwealth nations. While Singapore courts still refer to case law emerging
from England, it has made significant departures in the past 30 years,
especially in statute-based areas such as company law, criminal law and
evidence, in favour of local jurisprudence.
The Singapore legal structure comprises the
Legislature, Executive and Judiciary. The Legislature is made up of the
Parliament and an elected president. The Parliament is tasked with enacting
laws of the land. Singapore has a unique Parliamentary composition. Besides
elected Members of Parliament (MPs), non-elected MPs also sit in Parliament but
their voting rights are restricted to matters that do not concern the
Constitution, finance bills and votes of no-confidence in the Government.
The Executive is helmed by the President and comprises
the Cabinet which is responsible for the general direction of the Government
and accountable to Parliament. Cabinet ministers are drawn from MPs and as such
there is no complete separation of powers between the Legislature and the
Executive.
Singapore has a comprehensive judicial system. The
State Courts (previously known as Subordinate Courts) form the first tier in
the judicial hierarchy to administer justice amongst the people. It comprises
the District Courts, Magistrates' Courts, specialised courts – Family Court,
Juvenile Court, Coroner's Court – Small Claims Tribunals and the Court
Mediation Centre. The District Courts, Magistrates’ Courts and Small Claims
Tribunals can hear civil matters where disputed amounts do not exceed $250,000,
$60,000 and $10,000 respectively.
The second tier is the Supreme Court, made up of the
High Court and Court of Appeal, the latter being the highest court in the land.
Both courts hear criminal cases and civil claims exceeding $250,000. The Chief
Justice, Judges of Appeal, Judges and Judicial Commissioners are appointed by
the President on the advice of the Prime Minister.
While the judicial system has been efficient in
dispensing justice, the Government has found it necessary and expedient to
complement the courts with other modes of alternative dispute resolution (ADR),
namely arbitration and mediation. Having established itself as a major
international commercial centre, Singapore has made giant leaps to cater to the
demands of business for cheaper, quicker and, at times, confidential dispute resolution.
It has positioned itself as a competitive arbitration centre to match that of
London and Hong Kong. Major law firms in Singapore now offer arbitration
services, and institutions with state-of-the-art hearing facilities are in
place to meet the arbitration needs of disputants.
For smaller claims, mediation has been promoted as an
alternative method of resolving disputes. The State Courts via their Primary
Dispute Resolution Centre and the Singapore Mediation Centre are the two main
mediation avenues. The rest are initiatives spearheaded by the Government or
industry namely Maintenance of Parents Tribunal, Community Mediation Centre and
Consumers’ Association of Singapore.
No comments:
Post a Comment