Phila
Siu
Labour minister Matthew Cheung warns
that the code will be turned into legislation if agencies fail to comply with
its requirements
In an attempt to crack down on malpractices among
employment agencies for domestic helpers, the Labour Department has issued a
100-page draft code of practice setting out a list of standards the city’s
1,400 agencies must meet.
While the code is not legally
binding, the department has made clear in the code that the labour commissioner
is granted power under the Employment Ordinance to revoke agency licences if
the bosses are considered unfit to operate their businesses
In deciding
whether a licence should be revoked, the commissioner takes into account
whether the agency boss has adhered to the standards listed in the code.
“The code is a giant step forward.
Many people are concerned about the protection of domestic workers and employers,
as well as the agencies’ mode of operation. That’s why we have spent quite some
time to draft this code,” Secretary for Labour and Welfare Matthew Cheung
Kin-chung told members of the Legislative Council’s manpower panel on Tuesday.
“If the code turns out to be
ineffective, we do not rule out the possibility of legislating [it]. That means
it will become mandatory.”
Cheung said he aimed to legislate
the code two years after it came into practice if it turned out to be
ineffective.
Under the code, agencies need to
draw up separate service agreements with domestic workers and employers. They
must list clearly the service terms and the fees an agency will charge.
The department has provided
samples of the contracts in different languages. Agencies must distribute them
to domestic helpers, who then need to confirm in writing that the agencies have
briefed them about contract details.
Another
requirement is that agencies need to brief workers on their labour rights and
how they can seek assistance from the government if they have to.
A consultation will last until
June 17.
Democratic Party lawmaker Sin
Chung-kai had doubts over the effectiveness of the code.
“In many cases, when things went
wrong, it was not because of the Hong Kong agencies. It was their overseas
partners. The code fails to regulate the partnership between the Hong Kong and
overseas agencies,” he said.
Party chairwoman Emily Lau
Wai-hing described the code as a “toothless tiger”.
A government document submitted to
the Legco panel also showed that the department had carried out more checks on
agencies over the past three years. The number rose from 1,013 in 2013 to 1,352
in 2014 and 1,348 last year. In the first quarter of this year, the department
inspected 422 agencies.
No comments:
Post a Comment