A year ago,
Ukrainian troops retreated from #Debaltseve; official spokesmen of the military
and political command called the retreat a “success,” but many are still
skeptical about it. Before Debaltseve, Ukraine suffered a series of defeats,
including the Battle of Ilovaisk that raised questions about the causes of the
tragedy.
The real culprits behind shortcomings that led to hundreds and
thousands of deaths and territorial losses have not been named yet. Since the
retreat from a strategic railway junction was claimed to be a “success,” no
public investigation into the causes of the tragedy has been possible, although
The Day understands that some kind of investigation is underway.
When the agreements were being signed, Debaltseve was
still controlled by Ukrainian troops, but the strange surrender of Lohvinovo
(the town was key in this story, being located on the supply line, but for some
reason, it was left undefended) already hinted that the crisis would soon be
resolved, and not in our favor. And so it happened. The Minsk II agreements
were called “peace agreements,” but their implementation was delayed for a few
days. The enemy took Debaltseve precisely over these few days.
The several days-long breakdown of communication, lack
of mandatory passwords in the sector and many other things showed that no
coordinated retreat happened. There was a clear feeling of chaos, which calls
into question competence of command. Let us stress it – we mean competence of
the high command.
No comments:
Post a Comment