BY ROBIN EMMOTT
NATO may
combat Kremlin "weaponisation of information" used to support action
such as the 2014 seizure of Crimea by creating a new more powerful
communications section and declassifying more sensitive material, according to
draft plans.
Both
NATO and the European Union are concerned by Russia's ability to use television
and the Internet to project what they say is deliberate disinformation. The EU
set up a special unit last year to counter what it considers overt propaganda.
Draft proposals
by NATO's military committee seen by Reuters set out how military tactics - to
understand adversaries and then influence foreign audiences - could become part
of a more integrated communications strategy.
The 23-page
document, part of a long-running debate at the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization, is sensitive.
NATO, in its
own parlance, is considering "strategic narratives that lead to aligned
words and actions ... appropriately adapted and culturally attuned to resonate
with all audiences and counter opposing narratives."
NATO declined
to comment on the draft but said its military committee is working on a policy
of strategic communications.
"Nations
are yet to discuss this draft policy and it is the nations who will ultimately
approve it," said Eva Svobodova, public affairs and strategic
communications advisor to the chairman of the military committee.
Though favored
by Britain and others, the United States is wary of any strategy that could be
construed as base propaganda.
Officials say the credibility of NATO, an alliance
of 28 democracies, relies on being open and truthful.
"One of the main principles of NATO is
that we cannot counter propaganda with more propaganda," said NATO
spokesperson Oana Lungescu, who grew up in Romania under communist rule.
Russia has invested in a state-of-the-art
media organization with hundreds of journalists abroad intended to wean the
world off what it calls aggressive Western propaganda - dubbing it, with echoes
of the Cold War, Sputnik.
It is also now very active on the
internet, in social media such as twitter.
"They can create a virtual reality
that is meant to confuse and achieve certain aims," said one Western
diplomat.
BLURRED LINE
NATO, according to the proposals, could
move more quickly to declassify images to back NATO warnings of threatening
activity, as well as communicating more on social media. The strategy may be
discussed at a July summit in Warsaw.
After Russia moved into Crimea, NATO
unveiled photographs of Russian deployments near the Ukrainian frontier but
they were commercial satellite images and shown more than a month after the
annexation.
NATO already has two strategic
communications units, a YouTube channel with some 33,600 followers, and has
increased its social media presence and its response to media queries.
However, some believe that is not enough,
pointing to unconventional warfare techniques from unidentified troops - the
so-called "green men" without insignia in Crimea and eastern Ukraine
- to disinformation operations and cyber attacks.
Strategic communications involves
coordinating various means of informing the media and the public, as well as
so-called psychological operations (PsyOps), to influence public opinion.
"NATO is indicating it wants strategic
communications to be better placed to detect information threats at the
earliest stage," said Stephen Badsey, professor of conflict studies at the
University of Wolverhampton.
NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg, in
words that might have been uttered in Cold War days of less sophisticated
communications, told the World Economic Forum in Davos there was a
"blurring line between war and peace".
No comments:
Post a Comment