But in a region plagued by corruption and unemployment, the nationalists may not win
IF YOU look up from the bustle
of the winter tourists thronging the streets of Barcelona, you will see some
balconies draped with the estelada, a blend of
the Catalan and Cuban flags that has become the banner of those who want their
land to become independent. There are fewer than there were, but still enough
to inspire the Catalan regional government’s pledge that 2017 will be the year
when it will hold a binding referendum on independence. Since the Spanish
government refuses to contemplate such a vote, a confrontation seems
inevitable.
Indeed, it has already begun.
Some 300 Catalan officials face court cases for flouting the law, in acts
ranging from a previous unilateral effort in 2014 to organise an independence
vote to petty protests, such as flying the estelada from
town halls. Carles Puigdemont, the president of the Generalitat (the Catalan
government), promises to push through “laws of disconnection” in the summer,
such as one setting up its own tax agency, prior to holding a referendum, probably
in September. His pro-independence coalition has a majority in the Catalan
parliament. On December 14th 2016 Spain’s Constitutional Tribunal warned the
Generalitat that the referendum would be illegal. Spain could face
unprecedented defiance of its democratic constitution.
How has it come to this?
Spain’s democratic constitution of 1978 gave Catalonia, one of the country’s
most prosperous regions, more self-government than almost any other part of
Europe. The Generalitat controls not just schools and hospitals but police and
prisons. It has made Catalan the main language of teaching. Under Jordi Pujol,
the skilful moderate nationalist cacique (political
boss) who headed the Generalitat from 1980 to 2003, Catalonia was content with
this settlement, using its votes in the Madrid parliament to extract increments
to it powers and revenues.
Two things upset matters. The
first was when the Constitutional Tribunal in 2010 watered down a new autonomy
statute, which recognised Catalonia’s sense of nationhood and granted
additional legal powers to the Generalitat. It had been approved by referendum
in Catalonia and by the Spanish parliament. The second factor was the economic
crisis after the bursting of Spain’s property bubble in 2008.
The following year saw the
first of several demonstrations blaming Madrid, rather than Artur Mas, Mr
Pujol’s heir, for austerity. Support for independence surged from less than 25%
to more than 45%. “Society moved towards more radical positions,” thinks Joan
Culla, a historian. Others see this as at least in part induced by the
Generalitat, with its money and powerful communications machine. It allowed the
nationalists to keep power, despite budget cuts and revelations that for
decades they had taken rake-offs on public contracts.
Catalan society remains split.
“There aren’t the numbers to advance [to independence] but there’s enough to
make a lot of noise,” says Jordi Alberich of the Cercle d’Economia, a business
group.
This stand-off has been
politically profitable not just for the Catalan nationalists but also for
Mariano Rajoy, Spain’s prime minister, and his conservative People’s Party. His
unyielding defence of his country’s territorial unity is popular in most places
outside Catalonia. For years Mr Rajoy did nothing to respond to Catalan
grievances, some of which are justified.
Catalonia pays more into the central
kitty than it gets back. Its transport systems have been neglected while Madrid
has spiffy metro lines and a surfeit of motorways.
Yet weariness with the
deadlock has taken hold, in both Barcelona and Madrid. Last month Mr Rajoy put
his deputy, Soraya Sáenz de Santamaría, in charge of the Catalan question. She
is putting feelers out to the Generalitat. Mr Puigdemont has published a list
of 46 points to negotiate. It starts with the
“binding referendum”.
It is not hard to divine the
contours of a deal. Mr Rajoy could offer concessions on financing and
infrastructure. More controversially, he could propose recognising the Catalan
language or that Catalonia is a nation within Spain. All this might trim
support for independence to 25% or so.
The toughest issue is the
referendum. This is no moment to contemplate any sort of plebiscite with
equanimity. Catalan nationalists claim to be exemplary pro-Europeans. But there
are many echoes of Brexit in Catalonia. Instead of Brussels, it is Madrid the
nationalists accuse of stealing Catalans’ money. They argue that independence
would be quick and easy. “The great growth in support for independence from
2012 was the first manifestation of populism in Spain,” says Javier Cercas, a
writer who lives in Barcelona.
Mr Puigdemont insists that
blocking the referendum “would be bad news for democracy”. He is prepared to
negotiate its timing. But he adds: “We won’t easily renounce it. I think we’ve
earned the right to be heard.” Some in Barcelona believe the Generalitat’s
leaders are searching for a dignified way to back down. Mr Puigdemont talks
also of “constituent” elections to found a new state. But his party, clouded by
corruption, may suffer. The Catalan variant of Spain’s left-wing Podemos, which
already runs Barcelona’s city government and which is forming a new, broader,
party, is likely to gain ground. It wants Catalonia to form part of a
“plurinational” Spain, a cleverly vague formula.
“Is being part of Spain a
problem in the daily life of Catalans?” asks Inés Arrimadas of Ciudadanos, an
anti-nationalist party that leads the opposition in the Catalan parliament.
“For us the problems of Catalonia are unemployment, poverty and corruption.”
The longer the deadlock lasts, the harder Mr Puigdemont may find it to persuade
Catalans otherwise.
No comments:
Post a Comment