POSTED ON BY MICHELLE CAPEZZA
As the
employer-employee relationship and the meaning of a “workplace” continue to
evolve in the “gig” (or “sharing” or “on-demand”) economy, a model of portable
employee benefits, which are managed by mobile workers themselves, is gaining
appeal. This employee benefits approach is not currently intended to replace
employer-provided benefits for all workers but rather to fill a gap for those
who may work independently as contractors or as temporary employees, do not
have access to workplace benefits, or move from employer to employer quite
frequently. Development of such a model, however, calls into question the
future of the employer-provided system of employee benefits, which has been
under attack in recent years.
As a result of
the demise of the employer-provided pension plan and the rise of
participant-directed savings plans, workers have already felt the movement away
from the paternalistic approach to retirement benefits. This development has
not been without controversy, as exemplified by the debates regarding
participant savings rates, education regarding investments and fee
transparency, and the U.S. Department of Labor’s (“DOL’s”) fiduciary rule
regarding investment advice.
Also, on the
health care front, the Affordable Care Act has provided a platform for workers
to obtain their own individual health insurance in the Marketplace, either
through choice or necessity, and the tax benefits of employer-provided health
benefits are being threatened in tax reform initiatives. With the
implementation of consumer-driven designs, employees are also managing their
health spending and insurance choices.
These changes in
benefits design and access to employer-provided programs, as well as the rise
of the mobile workforce, have provided a foundation for further movement toward
portable benefits. This movement continues to manifest itself in several ways,
including through:
·
President Obama’s call for portable benefits programs. In his fiscal year 2017 budget, President Obama called for
the development of programs to provide grants to states and nonprofits to
design ways to provide retirement and other employee benefits that can be portable
and accommodate contributions from multiple employers. In addition, he called
for legislation regarding open multiple employer plans (“MEPs”) among
unaffiliated employers to allow for pooled plans and continued contributions
when employees move between employers participating in the same MEP. He also
proposed requirements to allow part-time workers to participate in plans and
measures for easier rollovers to plans. These initiatives would build upon
earlier proposals for automatic payroll individual retirement accounts (“IRAs”)
and other tax credit initiatives to small businesses.
·
Automatic payroll IRA programs and
other alternatives. For employers that do not sponsor any retirement
savings plans, there is increased momentum for automatic payroll IRAs. To date,
at least five states (California, Connecticut, Illinois, Maryland, and Oregon)
have enacted legislation that will require certain employers that do not
sponsor a retirement plan to enroll employees automatically in a state-run IRA
program. New Jerseyand Washington have approved
retirement marketplaces for eligible employers to shop for retirement savings
programs, and many more states are considering alternatives, including
state-run IRAs and MEPs. These initiatives follow guidance from the DOL
facilitating such efforts (including parameters for state-run IRAs to avoid
being subject to ERISA) and complement the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s
guidance regarding myRA accounts, as well as President Obama’s
agenda. Other legislative proposals include mandates for contributions to plans
run by third parties or the federal government. Laws
in this area will continue to evolve.
·
Portability policy advocates. In “Common Ground for Independent Workers,” an array of businesses,
labor organizations, venture capitalists, and other stakeholders in the gig
economy have called for policies to ensure a social safety net for all workers.
This past May, Uber was among the first employers in the gig economy to come to
agreement with the Independent Driver’s Guild, which is working on ways to
offer its members a range of portable benefits. Retirement Clearinghouse (“RC”)
has advocated for auto-portability plans that move retirement savings assets
automatically with workers as they switch jobs. RC has requested an advisory
opinion from the DOL to permit negative consent, which would allow plan account
balances to roll automatically into a new employer’s plan.
What Employers
Should Do Now
In the race for
talent, it is important for employers to consider their own philosophy
concerning employee benefits and the types of programs that they desire to
offer their workers, whether full time, part time, contingent, or otherwise. It
is also necessary to assess compliance with any programs that may be mandated
by changing laws. In this evolving landscape, an employer
should:
·
examine its organization’s workforce and determine
which benefits programs are desirable to attract, motivate, and retain these
workers in a competitive marketplace;
·
identify any gaps in benefits offerings and consider
how to fill those gaps;
·
monitor legislation affecting employee benefits and
applicable compliance requirements; and
·
determine whether its organization is subject to laws that
will require it to comply with certain government-mandated programs when no
applicable benefit program is otherwise offered by the employer, and decide
whether it is instead desirable to establish, or expand coverage under, an
employer-sponsored plan.
No comments:
Post a Comment