I.
The IOC
Executive Board (EB) has today further studied the question of the
participation of Russian athletes in the Olympic Games Rio 2016. In its
deliberations, the IOC EB was guided by a fundamental rule of the Olympic
Charter to protect clean athletes and the integrity of sport.
The study
included the discussion of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)’s Independent
Person (IP) Report by Prof. Richard McLaren; the decision of the Court of
Arbitration for Sport (CAS) on 21 July 2016 concerning the rules of the
International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF); as well as the
Olympic Charter and the World Anti-Doping Code.
Given the
urgency of the situation, with the Olympic Games Rio 2016 starting in 12 days,
and the athletes’ entry process already underway, the IOC EB had to take a
preliminary decision with regard to the participation of Russian athletes in
Rio de Janeiro. Prof. McLaren states in his report that it “fulfils partially
the mandate of the Independent Person”. This is why the IOC supports his
request to continue and finalise his work. On the other hand, this situation
leads to an urgency for the IOC which does not allow it sufficient time for
hearings for affected athletes, officials and organisations.
The IOC EB
has given the Russian Olympic Committee (ROC) the opportunity to present the
case of the Russian athletes and the ROC. This was done by Mr Alexander Zhukov,
ROC President, at the beginning of the EB telephone conference, which he left
immediately following his presentation.
During his
presentation, Mr. Zhukov explained that the Russian Federation and the ROC
guarantee full cooperation with all international organisations to shed light
on the issue in every respect. He also guaranteed that the ROC commits to a
complete and comprehensive restructuring of the Russian anti-doping system. In
this context, he stressed that the ROC is committed to clean sport and would
work towards guaranteeing clean sport in Russia.
He further
stated that all Russian athletes selected for the Olympic Games Rio 2016 have
been tested over the last six months by foreign anti-doping agencies. Samples
were taken by foreign doping control officers and the samples analysed in
foreign laboratories. Russian athletes who participated in different
competitions in all sports have submitted more than 3,000 doping samples. The
vast majority of the results were negative.
The IOC EB
discussed the status of the ROC. In this respect, it took note of the fact that
the IP Report made no findings against the ROC as an institution.
The IOC EB
took note of a letter dated 23 July 2016 from the International Shooting Sport
Federation (ISSF). In this letter the ISSF confirms having received from WADA
information about the three “disappearing samples” concerning shooting. The
ISSF states that these three samples had been entered, at the time they were
reported, into WADA’s ADAMS Results Management System as positives, and all the
result management procedures have already been followed.
On the
basis of the Findings of the IP Report, all Russian athletes seeking entry to
the Olympic Games Rio 2016 are considered to be affected by a system subverting
and manipulating the anti-doping system. The IP Report indicates that, due to
“the highly compressed timeline”, the IP has “only skimmed the surface of the
extensive data available”. The IOC EB therefore came to the conclusion that
this view cannot be restricted only to athletes from the 20 Olympic summer
sports mentioned in the IP Report.
Under
these exceptional circumstances, Russian athletes in any of the 28 Olympic
summer sports have to assume the consequences of what amounts to a collective
responsibility in order to protect the credibility of the Olympic competitions,
and the “presumption of innocence” cannot be applied to them. On the other
hand, according to the rules of natural justice, individual justice, to which
every human being is entitled, has to be applied. This means that each affected
athlete must be given the opportunity to rebut the applicability of collective
responsibility in his or her individual case.
After
deliberating, the IOC EB decided:
1. The IOC
will not accept any entry of any Russian athlete in the Olympic Games Rio 2016
unless such athlete can meet the conditions set out below.
2. Entry
will be accepted by the IOC only if an athlete is able to provide evidence to
the full satisfaction of his or her International Federation (IF) in relation
to the following criteria:
• The IFs*, when establishing their
pool of eligible Russian athletes, to apply the World Anti-Doping Code and
other principles agreed by the Olympic Summit (21 June 2016).
• The absence of a positive national
anti-doping test cannot be considered sufficient by the IFs.
• The IFs should carry out an
individual analysis of each athlete’s anti-doping record, taking into account
only reliable adequate international tests, and the specificities of the
athlete’s sport and its rules, in order to ensure a level playing field.
• The IFs to examine the information
contained in the IP Report, and for such purpose seek from WADA the names of
athletes and National Federations (NFs) implicated. Nobody implicated, be it an
athlete, an official, or an NF, may be accepted for entry or accreditation for
the Olympic Games.
• The IFs will also have to apply their
respective rules in relation to the sanctioning of entire NFs.
3. The ROC
is not allowed to enter any athlete for the Olympic Games Rio 2016 who has ever
been sanctioned for doping, even if he or she has served the sanction.
4. The IOC
will accept an entry by the ROC only if the athlete’s IF is satisfied that the
evidence provided meets conditions 2 and 3 above and if it is upheld by an
expert from the CAS list of arbitrators appointed by an ICAS Member,
independent from any sports organisation involved in the Olympic Games Rio
2016.
5. The
entry of any Russian athlete ultimately accepted by the IOC will be subject to
a rigorous additional out-of-competition testing programme in coordination with
the relevant IF and WADA. Any non-availability for this programme will lead to
the immediate withdrawal of the accreditation by the IOC.
Beyond
these decisions, the IOC EB reaffirmed the provisional measures already taken
on 19 July 2016. They remain in place until 31 December 2016, and will be
reviewed by the EB in December 2016.
Additional
sanctions and measures may be imposed by the IOC following the final report of
the IP and due legal procedure by the IOC Disciplinary Commission established
on 19 July 2016 under the chairmanship of Mr Guy Canivet (Vice-Chair of the IOC
Ethics Commission, former member of the French Constitutional Court and
President of the French Cour de Cassation) and the IOC EB.
The IOC EB
reaffirms its serious concerns about the obvious deficiencies in the fight
against doping. The IOC thus emphasises again its call to WADA to fully review
their anti-doping system. The IOC will make its contribution to this review by
proposing measures for clearer responsibilities, more transparency, better
supervision procedures and more independence.
* The IAAF
has already established its eligibility pool with regard to Russian athletes.
II.
The IOC EB
further studied the request by the Russian track and field athlete, Mrs Iuliia
Stepanova, to compete in the Olympic Games Rio 2016 as a “neutral athlete”.
Since Mrs Stepanova declined to compete as a member of the ROC Team, the IOC EB
had to consider the question of whether an exception to the rules of the
Olympic Charter is possible and appropriate. Since this request has important
ethical aspects, the IOC EB had asked the IOC Ethics Commission for its advice.
The Ethics Commission has heard Mrs Stepanova and IAAF and ROC representatives.
Mrs
Stepanova is basing her request on her role as “whistle-blower” with regard to
the manipulation of the anti-doping system and corruption involving the
WADA-accredited Moscow Anti-Doping Laboratory, the All-Russia Athletic
Federation (ARAF) and the IAAF. The Ethics Commission applauds the contribution
of Mrs Stepanova to the fight against doping. It put this contribution into the
perspective of Mrs Stepanova’s own long implication, of at least five years, in
this doping system and the timing of her whistle-blowing, which came after the
system did not protect her any longer following a positive test for which she
was sanctioned for doping for the first time.
After a
careful evaluation of the arguments, the Ethics Commission gave the following
advice to the IOC EB:
“While it
is true that Mrs Stepanova’s testimony and public statements have made a
contribution to the protection and promotion of clean athletes, fair play and
the integrity and authenticity of sport, the Rules of the Olympic Charter
related to the organisation of the Olympic Games run counter to the recognition
of the status of neutral athlete. Furthermore, the sanction to which she was
subject and the circumstances in which she denounced the doping practices which
she had used herself, do not satisfy the ethical requirements for an athlete to
enter the Olympic Games.”
The IOC EB
accepted the advice of the IOC Ethics Commission, also taking into
consideration its above-mentioned decision not to allow any Russian athlete who
has ever been sanctioned for doping to participate in the Olympic Games Rio
2016. Therefore, the IOC will not enter Mrs Stepanova as a competitor in the
Olympic Games Rio 2016.
However,
the IOC EB would like to express its appreciation for Mrs Stepanova’s
contribution to the fight against doping and to the integrity of sport.
Therefore the IOC invites Mrs Stepanova and her husband to the Olympic Games
Rio 2016. Furthermore, the IOC is ready to support Mrs Stepanova so that she
can continue her sports career and potentially join a National Olympic
Committee.
Lausanne, 24 July 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment