POSTED IN GENERAL IMMIGRATION NEWS AND UPDATES, H-1B TEMPORARY WORKERS, NON-IMMIGRANT VISAS (OTHER THAN ES, LS AND H-1B)
Recently, the American Immigration Council
(Council) and the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) teamed up on
a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration Services (USCIS) seeking to “obtain the information needed to
provide the public with an understanding of the operating procedures and
Defendant USCIS follows when administering the H-1B lottery. AILA seeks
declaratory, injunctive and other appropriate relief under the Freedom of
Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, to compel the release of records …”
As stated in the complaint, with an annual limit
of 65,000 visas for new hires, and 20,000 additional visas for professionals
with an advanced degree from a U.S. university, employer’s demand for H-1B
visas has exceeded the statutory cap for more than ten years. As a result,
U.S. employers seeking highly skilled foreign professionals have to submit
petitions to USCIS on the first five business day of April for the limited pool
of H-1B nonimmigrant visa numbers that are available for the coming fiscal
year.
If USCIS determines at any time during the first five business days of
the filing period that it has received more than enough petitions to meet the
numerical limits, the agency will use a computer-generated random selection
process (or “lottery”) to choose those petitions that will be accepted for
processing according to the statutory limits, taking into account a percentage
of the petitions selected which will be denied, withdrawn, or otherwise
rejected. Petitions not selected will be returned to the petitioning employers.
“When petitions are submitted to USCIS in April,
it’s as if they disappear into a ‘black box,’” said Melissa Crow, Legal
Director of the American Immigration Council. “This suit is intended to pry
open that box and let the American public and those most directly affected see
how the lottery system works from start to finish, and to learn whether the
system is operating fairly and all the numbers are being used as the law
provides.” As stated by Benjamin Johnson, AILA Executive Director, “Despite the
Obama Administration’s public commitment to the values of transparency and
accountability, frankly, our attempts to see into this process have been
resisted.
Instead of responding to our requests for information about how the
lottery is conducted, how cap-subject petitions are processed, and how the
numbers are estimated and tracked, USCIS has kept the process entirely opaque.
This litigation is intended to shine a necessary light on an important process
in America’s business immigration system. ”
No comments:
Post a Comment