Freedom means the supremacy of human rights everywhere
Friday, March 25, 2016
The Russia-Georgia war: why the ICC is launching war crimes probe
Fatou Bensouda
the prosecutor of the International
Criminal Court
International criminal court judgeshave authorised my
officeto open an investigation into alleged war crimes and crimes against
humanity committed in South Ossetia during the 2008 armed conflict.
The conflict was triggered by growing tensionsover the status of the
region. During a relatively short but intense
period of fighting, hundreds of people are alleged to havebeen killed or injured, including peacekeepers, thousands of people displaced and properties
destroyed on a mass scale.
My office first starting analysing the
situation back in August 2008, while the conflict was ongoing. The purpose of
this was to figure out whether the legal criteria for an international criminal
court (ICC) investigation were met.
This included the question of whether there were any relevant and
genuine national judicial investigations and prosecutions going on in the
countries involved. The Rome Statute, the treaty that governs our work,
dictates that the ICC cannot proceed with an investigation if the same cases
are already being pursued through national legal systems.
For a long time, Georgian and Russian
investigations appeared to be progressing. More recently, however, proceedings
inGeorgiastalled
due to the fragile and volatile security situation in South Ossetia and
surrounding areas. As such, in March of last year, my office was informed in
unequivocal terms by the Georgian government that there is “no prospect of
further progress domestically on the cases related to the 2008 armed conflict.”
In the absence of national proceedings, I asked the ICC judges to
authorise my office to undertake our own investigation.
We will now start collecting evidence from a variety of sources
concerning all crimes allegedly committed under the court’s jurisdiction.
Identifying suspects will come only at a later stage.
If the evidence collected provides
reasonable grounds to believe that a person has committed war crimes or crimes
against humanity, then we will proceed to the next phase, which would be to
apply to the ICC judges for a warrant of arrest or a summons to appear before
the court.
Criminal responsibility
This investigation is open-ended and does not target anyone. It is
neither about geopolitics nor settling political differences. It is also not
about determining the status of South Ossetia, or assigning blame for the
outbreak of hostilities in August 2008.
It is an independent legal process aimed
at uncovering the truth regarding grave crimes allegedly perpetrated during the
2008 conflict.
Our mandate concerns individual criminal
responsibility. It is about bringing a measure of justice to the victims of serious
crimes allegedly committed during the 2008 war. It is about holding to account
those responsible – irrespective of their status, background or nationality.
My team and I have met with the Georgian authorities. During my meeting
in February with prime minister Giorgi Kvirikashvili and a number of senior
ministers from his cabinet, as well as a successful visit of a court delegation
to Tbilisi that same month, the Georgian authorities reaffirmed their
commitment to fully cooperate with my investigation.
My office hopes to receive cooperation
from all sides to the conflict. We are seeking to visit all the relevant
authorities as well as alleged crime scenes, and stand ready to do so. I have
been encouraged by local assurances of cooperation, and I have also noted with
appreciation public statements of support from South Ossetia.
I am committed to do my part and I hope I can count on all parties to do
the same. The suffering of victims of atrocity crimes must weigh heavily on our
collective conscience, and compel us to do what is right. Justice is their due.
No comments:
Post a Comment