Chosun University - Department of Law
Abstract:
The abolition of
death penalty is one commonplace issue over global jurisdictions. Nevertheless,
it is also true that a surfeit of research has been dealt either in any
specific way of legal research or general method of social science. This tends
to create a track of practice that they approach the issue in its own national
standard of research or discrete logic and narrative.
The author proposes an
orthodox of legal research by exemplifying the issue of death penalty. By
demonstrating a process of legal research into exemplary concerns about the
death penalty between in Korea and US, the article would raise several
implications for the future studies; (i) the orthodox of legal research as
compared with the quantitative and qualitative methods (ii) key implications of
three traditional sources of legal research, i.e., secondary, primary-statute,
and primary-court cases (iii) encouragement of comparative social studies
between the parallel nations.
No comments:
Post a Comment