Ukrainian Law Blog
Freedom means the supremacy of human rights everywhere
(Move to ...)
Home
Ads Kit
▼
Topics
(Move to ...)
Home
Artificial Intelligence
BB: bitcoin, blockchain
Business Law
Crowdfunding
Cybersecurity
Design Blog
Doing errands in Ukraine
Employment law
EU's Apple tax case
Intellectual Property
IoT - The Internet Of Things
Jenny Holt
KNEU’s Lawyers: Alternative Legal Service Provider...
Legal business/Legal tech
Lucy Adams: essay writing
MH17
Remote Working
Startups
Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
Vic Eugene Nicholson ♫♪♫
Rzeczpospolita Polska
Ukraine. Returning own history / Украина. Возвращение своей истории
Ukrainian Art
Алексей Арестович
Commercial representation
Running Errands in Ukraine
Free Legal Advice
About me
▼
Tuesday, June 12, 2018
Ukrainian TANAP pipeline support
Every so often, and
fairly frequently
of late, the subject of
Nord Stream II
, (NSII, NS2, – however a reader may label it) and the
Ukrainian GTS
appears here.
The blog has long held the position that it is perhaps in the Ukrainian economic and national security interest to seek to swiftly and thoroughly integrate into the European gas network in order to be able to import as much EU gas market supply as possible – and after fulfilling the Stockholm Arbitration Court judgement returning to a policy position of not buying Russian gas (directly), while politically accepting that any Russian transit fees across its territory are transactional incomes around which no national budget nor oligarchical interests can continue to be built (as historically was once the case).
Bi-directional pipelines and interconnectors with the EU would seem the prudent path for the future, and is perhaps where transit fees revenues should be targeted to finance that goal.
READ MORE HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment
‹
›
Home
View web version
No comments:
Post a Comment