By Brette Sember
If you’re facing divorce, you may be envisioning months and months of courtroom negotiations,
testimony, and hearings. However, depending on the path to divorce you choose
and the relationship you have with your soon-to-be ex, you might never have to
set foot in a courtroom and the whole thing could be wrapped up within a couple
of months.
Mediation makes divorce easier
Mediation is
one way to end your marriage without the courtroom. You and your spouse meet
with a mediator (who usually has a background as an attorney or therapist) who
acts as a neutral third party. The mediator helps you look at all of the issues
that need to be resolved in your divorce and come to a mutually acceptable
agreement for each.
The mediator doesn’t make decisions for
you; instead he or she helps you find consensus and reach compromise. The end
result is a signed agreement that becomes your divorce decree. Since everything
is resolved in mediation, there’s no need to go to court, testify, or have your
attorneys negotiate.
Another benefit of mediation is the
decreased cost. Instead of paying two attorneys to draft documents and go to
court, you and your spouse pay one mediator to meet with you and create a
settlement. Mediation can also help teach you and your spouse how to resolve
conflict yourselves. If you have children together, it is likely that you will
need to work through some disagreements in the future and mediation gives you
the skills to do so while changing the tone of a divorce from “me against you”
to “let’s figure this out together.”
Collaborative divorce reduces your
involvement
Collaborative divorce is
a process similar to mediation, but lawyers do the negotiating. Each spouse
hires a collaborative law attorney (these attorneys are specially trained for
this type of case and will not take the case to trial). The attorneys work
together to reach a settlement.
The process works like mediation, except
it is the two attorneys who meet and discuss the issues and look for ways to
compromise. In mediation, you and your spouse sit in the same room and work
through issues. With collaborative divorce, you never have to sit in the same
room, which can reduce anxiety and is useful if your divorce is very adversarial.
The end result of collaboration is a settlement agreement, which is submitted
to the court and becomes your divorce decree.
Collaborative divorce usually takes longer
than mediation, but not as long as a traditional divorce. Although it may cost
more than mediation, it is still less expensive than traditional divorce.
Arbitration settles your
differences
Not used as often as mediation or
collaborative divorce, arbitration can
be useful in divorces where the spouses are deadlocked and can’t reach a
settlement. Retired judges or respected local matrimonial attorneys head up an
arbitration process.
Your lawyers present the two sides of the
case and the arbitrator determines what a court would decide. This
determination then usually spurs a settlement, since everyone understands what
the alternative resolution in court would likely be. Arbitration allows you to
avoid a trial, which reduces your costs and wraps up the case more quickly.
Traditional settlements are an
alternative
The truth is that the majority of divorce
cases don’t make it to trial. Most attorneys work to settle the case from
the moment it is filed. Often, cases are not settled until a scheduled
conference with the court, but most do settle before a trial date. When the
case settles, you sign the settlement agreement, your attorney files it, and it
becomes the decree for your divorce.
And of course, if your relationship is
such that you can come to a mutual agreement without any of the above
negotiation tactics, you can take the easiest path of all and file for an uncontested divorce.
No comments:
Post a Comment