Russian president concedes military intelligence
officers were operating in the country but insists it’s not the same as regular
Russian troops
Vladimir Putin has for the first time admitted the presence of
Russian military specialists in east Ukraine.
Russia has repeatedly denied a military
presence in the conflict,
despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. But the Russian president
conceded there were military intelligence officers operating in the country in
a marathon press conference on Thursday.
Asked by a Ukrainian reporter an hour into the
briefing about two Russian military intelligence officers captured by Kiev and
currently on trial in Ukraine, Putin said: “We never said there were not people
there who carried out certain tasks including in the military sphere.” He
insisted this was not the same as regular Russian troops.
There was no opportunity for a follow-up question to
examine how many military specialists Putin believes were in Ukraine and what
exact tasks they were carrying out. At key moments in the conflict in east
Ukraine there has been much evidence of regular Russian army involvement.
Putin also initially denied the “little green men”
present during the annexation of Crimea were Russian soldiers but afterwards
admitted they were.
In the first part of his press conference, Putin also
dealt with questions about the Russian economy, corruption, Syria and the
recent crisis in relations with Turkey.
He struck an uncompromising note on Turkey, saying if
the shooting down of a Russian jet had been an accident, officials could have
called Moscow, but instead they called Nato first.
“Someone in the Turkish leadership tried to lick the
Americans in a particular place, I don’t know whether the Americans needed
that,” said Putin.
Putin said Russia was committed to its Syria campaign until a political
process starts and claimed its position on the country’s future “broadly
coincided” with the US.
“We will carry out air strikes and support Syrian army
offensives for as long as the Syrian army carries them out.”
“Russia’s
(Syria) plan, in principle, broadly coincides with the view put forward by the
United States. That is joint work on a constitution, creation of oversight
mechanisms for a future democratic election, the election itself, and
recognition of its results.”
The main sticking point between Moscow and the west is
on the role the Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad, could play in a future
transition. The US and most western countries insist Assad must leave office,
but have suggested in recent months he might be able to play a transitional
role for some period. Moscow has suggested it is “up to the Syrian people” to
decide, but in practice this appears to mean allowing Assad to set the terms of
the debate.
Russian warplanes have flown thousands of combat
sorties in Syria since Moscow began its air campaign on 30 September.
Putin said in the press conference that Russia was
ready to improve ties with the US and work with whoever is elected its next
president and talks with the US Secretary of State, John Kerry, earlier this
week showed that Washington is ready to “move toward settling the issues that
can only be settled through joint efforts.”
No comments:
Post a Comment