Thomas Gibbons-Neff
The United States has delivered more than $260 million
in non-lethal military equipment to help the government of Ukraine in its fight
against a Russian-backed insurgency, but some of the U.S.-supplied gear meant
to protect and transport Ukrainian military forces is little more than junk.
On the outskirts of the separatist-controlled
city of Donetsk, for example, one Ukrainian special forces unit is using
U.S.-supplied Humvees dating from the late 1980s and early 1990s, based on
serial numbers on the vehicles.
Three of the Humvees had plastic doors and windows
— barely any protection at all. The tires on one of the trucks blew apart after
driving only a few hundred kilometers, the result of sitting in a warehouse too
long, said one mechanic.
Another infantry unit of approximately 120 men
received from the Pentagon a single bulletproof vest — a type that U.S. troops
stopped using in combat during the mid-2000s.
“If the
Americans are going to send us equipment, don’t send us secondhand stuff,” said
one Ukrainian special forces commander, who like other soldiers spoke on condition
of anonymity to criticize the condition of his unit’s gear.
The obsolete equipment was identified on a tour
near the front lines in eastern Ukraine with help from mechanics serving in the
Ukrainian army and through interviews with front-line troops. In some cases,
serial numbers were used to trace the origins of certain vehicles.
The decaying state of U.S.-supplied equipment on
Ukraine’s front lines has bred distrust and lowered morale among Ukrainian
troops, soldiers said. Experts said the low quality of the gear also calls into
question the U.S. government’s commitment to a war that is entering its second
year, with well-equipped Russian-backed separatists still firmly entrenched in
Ukraine’s eastern region.
In recent weeks, attacks along Ukraine’s front
lines have spiked, with Ukrainian troops reporting casualties almost daily.
Last month, five Ukrainian soldiers were killed in one day.
“Despite what people think, this is still a
war,” a different Ukrainian special forces soldier said.
The Humvees observed near the front of the
fighting were part of a batch of about 100 sent to Ukraine earlier this year. The vehicles were shipped under a special executive power granted by Congress that allows the
president to send equipment to foreign countries quickly.
Pentagon spokesman Army Lt. Col Joe Sowers
wouldn’t comment directly on the condition of the vehicles but said in an
e-mail that the United States has continued to send equipment and provide
training “to help Ukraine better monitor and secure its border, operate more safely
and effectively, and preserve and enforce its territorial integrity.”
U.S. officials attributed the presence of
rundown U.S. defense equipment on Ukraine’s front lines to the need to get
equipment to Ukraine quickly at the start of the war.
According to a senior Defense Department
official, the United States was wholly unprepared for Russia’s involvement in
Ukraine and had to source funds and respond to Ukraine’s requests for aid from
a “cold start.”
“We wanted to get things there as fast as
possible and we had no money appropriated for this crisis,” said the official,
who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive policy issues. “Does that means
everything was perfect? Of course not.”
It is unclear how much of the material sent to
Ukraine is secondhand and antiquated. The U.S. government has also sent new
equipment, such as night vision and first-aid kits. Troops there have also
received advanced equipment such as counter artillery, counter mortar radars,
and communications gear.
In addition to the dated vehicles already sent,
another 100 Humvees of similar vintage have been authorized to be offered for shipment to Ukraine as
part of the military’s standard program for transferring extra equipment “as
is” to foreign countries.
The program sends “the stuff that’s sitting
around somewhere that no service can use,” said an official at the Pentagon who
spoke on condition of anonymity to speak frankly about the equipment. “In some
cases Humvees might be provided … for spare parts. They’re not good enough to
drive, but you can tear them apart and cannibalize [them].”
In the case of the Humvees in Ukraine, Lt. Col.
Andrei, the operations chief of the unit that received the vehicles, said they
were supposed to be sent in working order — not stripped for parts. The cost to
purchase a Humvee tire in Ukraine is roughly $1,000, so instead the unit bought
a cheap used SUV for a little more than what it would take to replace two
Humvee tires.
“Why would I pay to keep replacing tires when I
could just buy a car?” asked Andrei, who allowed only his first name to be used
to protect his family living in Russian-occupied territory.
The special presidential authority is just one
of five Defense and State department programs tapped to supply Ukraine in the
months since the start of the conflict.
The Pentagon has also devoted resources to the
war by having Army units establish various training programs to boost the
fledgling Ukrainian military and its abilities to maintain itself. To some
however, the battered equipment on the war’s front lines is emblematic of a
U.S. policy that has done the minimum to bolster the Ukrainian government and
deter a reinvigorated Russia.
Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-Tex.), chairman of the
House Armed Services Committee, said there is strong bipartisan support in
Congress to help Ukraine. Thornberry pointed to the recently passed National
Defense Authorization Act that included $300 million in support — including
lethal aid — for the embattled eastern European country. The only issue,
Thornberry added, is that “we can’t make the president deliver it.”
The administration’s “overriding concern here is
to avoid aggravating Putin,” said Thornberry in a recent phone interview. “And
it has a broader effect in limiting the Ukrainians’ ability to defend their
country.”
When asked about the administration’s goals, a
spokesperson for the National Security Council declined to comment on the
record. The current aid policy toward Ukraine is representative of the Obama
administration’s desire to “do enough militarily to ensure the Ukrainians can
defend their territory,” said Evelyn N. Farkas, the former deputy assistant
secretary of defense for Russia/Ukraine/Eurasia. But she said that more could
be done to deter future attacks.
“Right now, considering the stakes, our
resources are out of whack,” Farkas said.
She added that a diplomatic solution to the
crisis can be reached through stronger engagement — namely in the form of
sending weapons to Ukraine.
The White House, though, has resisted sending
lethal aid with a belief that sending the weapons to Ukrainian troops would
only escalate the conflict, said Farkas.
“This is about our values. This is about the
right of Ukraine’s citizens to elect their government and to be fully sovereign
and not under Russia’s thumb,” she said. “We have to take a stand and we have
to make sure Ukraine succeeds.”
No comments:
Post a Comment